Urban Education – The Here and Now!

March 29, 2009

Teach the Kids- The Parents will follow

Teach the Kids, and the Parents Will Follow

 

Like most principals, Dave Levin believed that parental support was essential to a school’s success. So when many families pulled their kids out of his struggling South Bronx charter school after its first year, he thought he was in trouble.

Some parents called him and his teaching partner, Frank Corcoran, “crazy white boys.” The two had recruited 46 fifth-graders, barely enough to start the Knowledge Is Power Program (KIPP) Academy, and 12 failed to return for sixth grade. Test scores were somewhat better than at other local schools, but Levin’s discipline methods weren’t working. By March of his second year he believed that he had no choice but to close the school.

That was 1997. Twelve years later, the academy, saved by a last-minute change of mind, is considered a great success and a model for the 66 KIPP schools in 19 states and the District. Together, they have produced the largest achievement gains for impoverished children ever seen in a single school network.

And Levin did it, in the beginning, with very mixed reviews from parents. The story of his school and others like it suggests that the importance of parental involvement, at least in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods, has been exaggerated, probably because middle-class commentators have been imposing their suburban experiences on very different situations. Unchallenged, this misunderstanding of what works for low-income children could stymie efforts to improve the country’s worst schools.

The best school leaders say that they don’t need much parental involvement when they are hiring staff, creating class schedules and putting discipline procedures in place. Take Susan Schaeffler, the founder of the cluster of KIPP schools in Washington. She had no track record and zero name identification when she and her staff started teaching fifth grade in an Anacostia church basement. She recruited students by standing in front of markets and shouting: “See me if you are interested in a school that will keep your child from eight in the morning to five in the afternoon!” That promise of free child care is what persuaded many parents to give her a try. Much time passed before she was able to prove that her teachers could produce the highest test scores of any public school in the city.

Perhaps the best teacher I ever met, Jaime Escalante at Garfield High School in East Los Angeles, was mostly ignored despite his early success. He had to extort parental action with a telephone voice that made him sound, his mostly Hispanic students insisted, like a village priest back in Mexico. If a student missed two days of his math class, he would call the parents and threaten to notify the immigration authorities or whoever he thought might motivate them if he did not see their child the next day. Only years later, after a movie made him famous, did parents decide that Escalante could do no wrong.

Low-income parents may often be distracted just trying to make a living, but they know what works. Once they see a school keeping its promises, they provide the kind of support found in suburban schools. But it’s important to remember that good schooling must come before parental support, not the other way around.

In 2006, when Sharron Hall enrolled three sons in KIPP’s KEY Academy in Southeast Washington, she wasn’t sure that it was the right move. At first she found it difficult to attend the meetings teachers called when her fifth-grader, Jaquan, failed to complete his homework. The school was on a commercial strip where parking was scarce. But this year, her third as a KIPP parent, she is backing every move the teachers make. She was particularly pleased when they decided to have Jaquan, who is younger than most of his classmates, repeat sixth grade. Years before, when she’d asked another charter school to hold back a daughter who couldn’t subtract 32 from 58, the teachers had laughed off her request.

Some parents, including those in Atlanta and in Fresno, Calif., who recently lodged complaints that KIPP teachers had punished their children excessively, say that the academies sometimes run roughshod over them. KIPP co-founder Mike Feinberg seemed to cross the line several years ago when he told a Houston mother that he would expel her TV-addicted fifth-grader unless she allowed him to remove the family’s television set from their apartment. But the mother went along with the plan, and the TV sat in the girl’s school homeroom until her steady improvement convinced Feinberg that he had broken the one-eyed monster’s grip.

Levin said he always listened to parents. But it wasn’t his conversations with them that won them over. It was what they found at the school, which even converted some former critics. He hired veteran public school teachers to help him improve discipline and start an all-school orchestra. Each year, test scores improved, until the KIPP Academy became the highest-performing middle school in the Bronx even though its student body was 86 percent low-income.

Levin saw how strongly parents felt about the academy when administrators and parents from P.S. 31, the regular school housed in the same building, petitioned the local school board to move KIPP elsewhere. When the board convened, only a handful of P.S. 31 supporters showed up, but more than 200 KIPP parents were there to cheer for their children’s school.

When the agenda item was announced, the crowd began to chant, “KIPP, KIPP, KIPP . . . .” The district superintendent pleaded for quiet, but the chanting continued until Levin took the microphone. He thanked everyone for coming and said how pleased he was to see parents so involved. The meeting soon ended, KIPP’s expulsion no longer an issue.

Such moments have led Levin and many other principals to conclude that they should both listen to parents and do what they know is best, confident that when children succeed, their gratified families will be with them all the way.

mathewsj@washpost.com

 

Jay Mathews is the education columnist for The Post and the author of a new book about the KIPP schools, “Work Hard. Be Nice: How Two Inspired Teachers Created the Most Promising Schools in America.”

September 1, 2008

180 days and counting……….

Some school years go beyond state-required 180 days

By tradition, Labor Day marks the great divide between an 11-week summer vacation and the start of school for most students.For a small but growing number of children in the Philadelphia area and around the country, however, it’s just another three-day holiday weekend.

Students at the KIPP Philadelphia Charter School have been in class since Aug. 11. The school’s 340 students, in grades five to eight, get 193 days of instruction, far more than the state-required 180 days. It also has a longer school day and students come in on Saturdays for extracurricular activities.

School CEO Marc Mannella said the added time was needed because many students were years behind academically when they enter fifth grade. “As far as I know, there’s no pixie dust that I can sprinkle over a child’s head to make up for years of wasted educational opportunity. It simply takes more time to catch them up,” he said.

Students buy into the idea. “The long hours are so they can actually teach you and help you achieve your goals and do good in class,” said fifth grader Alissa Smith. “They want to help us learn and help us get a better education so we can go to a good high school and college.”

Others say all American students need more time in class to compete with students from other countries who often get more instructional time and score higher on standardized tests.

The United States ties at 28th out of 29 countries in the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development at 22.2 hours of instruction per week. South Korea ranks first at 30.2 hours.

“We believe that the extra time in school in other countries has had a significant impact” on their achievement, said Jennifer Davis, who heads the National Center on Time and Learning in Boston, which advocates more time in school.

Strong American Schools, an education reform group, advocates more school time to increase America’s ability to compete in the global economy. Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, Japan, Poland, South Korea, and other nations have school days that are on average as much as 25 percent longer than in the United States, the group said.

Though the attention being paid to the issue is growing, the topic is not new: 25 years ago, the Nation at Risk study of American education called for seven hours of classroom instruction each day and 200 to 220 days in school.

In most schools, not much has changed. A recent survey by the National Center on Time and Learning had 28 states, including Pennsylvania and New Jersey, requiring 180 days of instruction, 12 with fewer days and only four – Hawaii, Kansas, Michigan and Ohio – with more. Six states set only total hours of instruction or leave it to school boards to decide.

Still, an increasing number of states, districts and charters have extended-time programs. In Massachusetts, 26 schools, most of them low-performing, will begin this year with students spending at least 30 percent more time in school. The state pays $1,300 more per student.

That initiative inspired Massachusetts Sen. Ted Kennedy to introduce the Time for Innovation Matters in Education (TIME) Act in August; it calls for $350 million in federal funding to set up similar programs.

In New Orleans, former Philadelphia schools CEO Paul Vallas extended the school day until 4:30 p.m. for the 12,500 students in the Recovery School District. He seeks to extend the school year by 20 days.

In Florida’s Miami-Dade district, students in 39 struggling schools have an hour a day more in school and five more school days a year.

In Pittsburgh, eight low-achieving schools added 45 minutes to the school day and 10 days to the school year.

Charter schools around the country often feature longer school days and years. “There are no shortcuts for success. If we want our students’ scores to grow academically, we have to put in a lot more time and effort,” said Jeremy Esposito, the head of Freedom Academy Charter in Camden, a KIPP school in session since Aug. 11.

In Pennsylvania, 254 districts reported an average school year of 181 days, up one day from four years ago. New Jersey does not keep student year statistics, but Department of Education spokesman Richard Vespucci said that most have 180-day schedules.

Pennsylvania and New Jersey require students to spend less than six hours per day in class: five hours and 53 minutes in New Jersey and five and a half hours a day in Pennsylvania.

Central Bucks Superintendent Robert Laws favors a shorter summer vacation and increasing the school calendar to around 200 days. His district now has 184. “If education is to be valued in this country, we should look at the calendar,” Laws said. “I don’t think it’s an urban issue, and I don’t think it’s just for the low-achieving. If we compare ourselves with other countries, we’ve got fewer days.”

The cost of extending school time works against change, because teachers unions say they want their members to be paid for more school time.

In Pennsylvania, 31 out of 501 districts have gotten state funding to expand school time, including Unionville Chadds Ford in Chester County and Jenkintown in Montgomery County. Jenkintown added 15 minutes to the school day, eliminated some half-days and plans to add two days, going from from 183 to 185, during the next two years.

“It’s simple: Kids learn more when we have more time to teach them,” said Tim Wade, superintendent.

Arlene Ackerman, Philadelphia’s new superintendent, says lagging students in particular need more time. “We have to give them more time if they need more time,” Ackerman said. She’s put the issue on her wish list for teacher negotiations.

Unions say they are not opposed to longer days but caution that more time in school is not the only solution to low achievement. “Everyone wants to find one silver bullet to close the achievement gap. There isn’t one,” said James Testerman, head of the Pennsylvania State Education Association.

Nicholas Ignatuk, Ridley superintendent, says extending the school year is not possible without federal funding.

“If it means raising local taxes, it is not going to happen,” he said.

Ignatuk said districts already extend the day and year with after-school tutoring and summer school. “The question is: do all students need it? If the vast majority of our seniors are graduating, getting good jobs and going on to good colleges, it may not be necessary for everybody.”

 


Contact staff writer Dan Hardy at 610-627-2649 or dhardy@phillynews.com.

**In my district, students can stay afterschool for one to 2.5 hours per day. They take art, physical education and remediation classes. I have always taught my students twice a week for an extra hour and a half per day. Sometimes I was paid and sometimes I wasn’t but the payment for me was building up a child’s skills in a small group or individualized setting afterschool so that they can do better in my class during the school day. Most of the time afterschool was spent teaching students skills that they missed in the earlier grades, filling in the holes in their academic foundation skills.
Students from affluent communities have the resources to take karate, dance, gymnastics, swimming and tutorial classes. Students in poor urban communities don’t have those resources. The issue that I have with KIPP is that this is an example another charter school that requires a student/parent/teacher to fill out a contract concerning their behavior and the extra days of schooling.
What about the schools who don’t have those types of contracts? What about the schools that rely on regular communication between the parent and the teacher? What happens when you make a contract with parents who did not like school and maybe never graduated from school?  When I talked to my parents about their child staying afterschool, I always have a few who do not follow through with making sure that their children stay. They allow their children to come home afterschool or they want their children to come home and babysit younger siblings.  When children do not take advantage of these opportunities to master the basic skills, it ultimately catches up with them in high school and beyond.  I can not tell you the number of high school students that I have had  to teach missing elementary and middle school skills to. Most school districts subscribe to the strategy that if you teach a skill in first grade and the child doesn’t get it, that is fine because the child will see the skill again in second grade, third grade and fourth grade, etc. I don’t subscribe to that learning strategy.  If a child is not learning a particular math concept, then that child needs to stay afterschool so that we can figure out exactly what is preventing that child from learning. Most of the time it is because that child did not learn a skill that was taught in earlier grades.
180 days is not sufficient if we are really committed to preparing our children to work in a global society.

August 18, 2008

Dr. Julia Hare- If you don’t know her you better ask somebody!

 

My favorite part of Dr. Julia Hare’s speech at the State of Black America – 2007 is:

When they took discipline away from the parents, we found out that:

The teachers were afraid of the Principals.

The principals were afraid of the Superintendents.

The Superintendents were afraid of the School Board.

The School Board were afraid of the parents.

The parents were afraid of the the children.

The Children WERE NOT afraid of anyone!!!

I read two articles today, “Fixing Washington D.C.’ s School system by Jeff Chu” – Fast Company and “A Teachable Moment by Paul Tough” - New York Times.  Both articles support what Dr. Hare was talking about, however in Washington D.C., they have taken the school board out of the equation. In New Orleans, the district written about in “A Teachable Moment”, they are going back to site based management and if you as a principal don’t produce the results dictated by the district then you will be replaced by someone else or another charter school management group.

In both articles, the goal of both districts is to improve the type of instruction being provided to poor students in those cities. As an administrator or teacher, if you have stopped having and working towards high expectations for your students, then please retire!

Two school districts , using two different types of managerial styles but expecting the same results. I look forward to following these two school districts as well as Chicago, New York , Philadelphia and Atlanta this upcoming school year. Because if any of these school districts produce the types of high results mandated by NCLB, they will become the blueprint for other struggling school districts.

Sidenote: Even though New Orleans acknowledges the mental support that is needed for the students in their district. Budgetary constraints prevent NOLA from staffing the schools with the necessary Social Work, Psychological, Counseling Professionals needed to help children be all that they can be! I haven’t read about Chancellor Rhee’s plan in regards to the psychological needs of the children. Right now, her major issue changing the current teacher senority-pay system. Reinstating music and art programs in all of the schools is very much needed but so are Social Workers, Counselors, Psychologists and Psychiatrists.

August 15, 2008

Throw some D’s on it!

As we start a new school year I want to introduce you to a student that most inner city teachers have experienced. A student who works for a D in your class. Personally, I don’t allow those types of students to thrive in my classroom. My students know that anything below a B is good enough! And towards the end of the school year, you can over hear students telling other students that a C isn’t good enough and they could have done better.

In my classroom, students are allowed to do F work over. My goal is that the student learn the objective more than receive a higher grade. Students can receive peer tutoring and/or afterschool tutoring to improve their grades in my classroom. My working with the students one on one or in small group settings, I can pinpoint where the student started experiencing problems in my classroom. Sometimes this means that the student has to learn some objectives from the previous grade during the afterschool sessions so that they will feel confident in my class. Sometimes it means assigning the student a peer tutor. Someone from my class who will work with that student to help to improve their grades. Let’s face it, some F students don’t know how to study and prepare for a test. They don’t know how to take notes, etc. They might have a reading problem but we work through all of those problems afterschool.

I am a teacher who believes that if a teacher has too many F students in their classroom, that they might be an F teacher.  This school year, let’s think of solutions to solve the problem when we encounter one of these F students in our classroom. If you can’t think of any solutions, work with your grade level or subject area team to come up with solutions to help this child to learn. If that child is doing F work in your class but doing A work in another class, find out what teaching methods that teacher is using to get that child engaged in their lessons. If you still can’t think of any solutions, send me an email and I will be happy to help you out! We can not continue to leave the F students behind!

Together we can Find our way to a D!

                          Dig our way to a C!

                          Carve our way to a B!

                          Bounce our way to an A!

August 13, 2008

Chicago Students Plan First- Day Boycott

Chicago Students Plan First-Day Boycott

Chicago State Senator James Meeks (D-Chicago) has proposed a rather radical action to protest the underfunding of Chicago’s inner city schools.

Meeks has issued a call for all school kids in Chicago’s poorest districts to boycott the first day at their assigned school and instead head to resource rich predominately white schools and attempt to register there.

Meeks plan has supporters and detractors. …

It’s no secret that schools in predominately poor urban and rural communities just do not provide the educational opportunities to be had in solidly middle class or affluent communities. But what to do about it? Republicans and others favor various forms of “school choice” or voucher programs where children stuck in a lousy school would have the option to move to one with stronger academic options.

Others simply want state and federal government to allocate more dollars to improving under-performing schools. ‘No Child Left Behind’ is an example of a recent government initiative meant to insure that all students have some basic, uniform standard of achievement.

From the Chicago Tribune:

Nearly 50 ministers on Monday embraced plans for students to boycott at least the first day of Chicago Public Schools classes, a move aimed at ramping up pressure on state officials to address widespread inequities in education funding.

The church leaders from the city’s West and South Sides pledged their support as lawmakers return to Springfield on Tuesday to meet in a special session Gov. Rod Blagojevich called to consider the funding issue that has vexed lawmakers for decades.

The ministers said they would urge their congregations and communities to participate in the first-day boycott Sept. 2 and attempt to enroll Chicago students in New Trier Township High School District in north suburban Winnetka.

“We refuse to continue to allow the State of Illinois to orphan our educational system,” said Rev. Albert Tyson of St. Stephen AME Church.

Frankly, I do not accept that you can increase education funding by encouraging students to skip school.

“It’s counterproductive to urge kids not to attend school,” Gov. Blagojevich said at a separate event. “If a child misses a day of school, that child will miss an opportunity to learn. I think children should take advantage of every possible day they can to go to school.”

Further, he said, Chicago Public Schools would lose some state money if students skip because average daily attendance helps determine each school district’s overall funding.

New Trier District 203 Supt. Linda Yonke, bracing for Meeks’ attempt to enroll 1,000 students, labeled the ministers’ move a “political action” she hopes won’t be disruptive.

 

 

If this is not an example of Social Studies in action, I don’t know what is! If a teacher is not able to make a connection between this student centered event and various theories, laws and philosophies taught in Social Studies, then they are not a very effective teacher. Now on one hand we talk about how this current generation of students is this and they are that. But then we are afraid to have them participate in a volunatry peaceful protest. A protest that benefts them and their education. This is a perfect example of getting kids to buy into the type of education that they are receiving that will prepare them for the future. 

If you read my post about Mayors + Superintendents and look at that youtube channel that the episode that I posted originated from you will find the CEO of Chicago Public Schools. A CEO that just told a U.S. committee of politicians that his school district was on the rise. But we know that it all comes down to money! I wonder why our politicians in Washington D.C. are not pushing  for more money to fund education instead of slashing the education budget. Oh, I forgot they want to privatize education. I guess they didn’t get the newsflash from Edison Schools that privatization of public schools doesn’t necessarily work!

Give Chicago the money needed to improve their schools, reinstate the physical education, music, art, afterschool programs and psychological and Social Work staff needed to help students in these schools and enforce the NCLB standards and watch the students soar!

August 4, 2008

Pay Attention!

August 2, 2008

1 Education = 2 Classes of People ?

 

No Child Left Behind was suppose to raise the educational standards of the country. I feel that it is an experiment that failed. Maybe it didn’t fail. Maybe it was an experiment to show the disparities between the school systems. The graduation rates are still low even when some of these students “passed” their standardized tests in elementary and middle school. How does this happen?

Most of the urban districts have gone into test preparation mode at the expense of everything else. No Art, No Music, very little physical education, No Theater, No This, No That all because we have to prepare for the test and not end up on the bad list. What about instilling the love of learning into children? What about that?

Growing up, I attended public and catholic school as a child. My mother took me out of public school for 6th-8th grades but I re-entered the public school system in High School because it was a “magnet” high school. I am sure that if charter schools were in existence back then, I would have gone to a charter school for middle school so that she could have saved some bucks.  We were not rich by any means, part of the working middle class but my mother valued education and did whatever it took to make sure that I not only attended college but GRADUATED from college.

When I attended catholic school, I don’t remember being tested to death. They gave you one test to determine your achievement level and that was it. Now my catholic school did not have a lot of extra-curricular activities like the neighborhood public middle school that my mother depised, we only had basketball and cheerleading. So I didn’t get a chance to take part in activities such as Academic Games, DAPCEP, Debate Club, Newspaper, etc. in middle school and that is part of the learning experience. BUT I didn’t have to worry about kids disrupting the classroom, metal detectors, peers who were not interested in education, etc.

So not being tested did not make me any less viable then I am today.

Urban schools don’t have the activities and sometime they don’t have the equipment to make learning fun but I have managed to make activities fun and bend rules so that my students can experience activities like other students around the country and world.  In Urban Schools if you get too much technology, you might come in one morning to find all of your technology gone and at the pawn shop, this is real people especially during these tough economic times.  So everything has to be triple locked up and that doesn’t even prevent some criminals. You would think that the community would watch out for the schools but either they subscribe to a “Don’t Snitch” philosophy, they are benefitting from the thefts or they are numb to the thefts because it happens so much that they just don’t know how to respond.

 

Therefore NCLB has highlighted the huge differences between the haves and have nots. Now I know in some urban districts people will say that if the money was spend correctly that we could buy everything and more for our classrooms. This is a correct assumption and I agree with you but I know cases where the equipment was bought one year and stolen the next and the major electronic companies will not replace the equipment unless you replace the money.

July 31, 2008

Public Education Reform: Here are some solutions

 

Finance: I currently write grants for my school and we do tap various foundations for funds. Schools should also have the children/parents to fundraise to raise money for things that we need. If they take some responsibility for purchasing the items, they are less likely to vandalize it or allow their neighbors, friends to come in and steal from the school. I also support “site based management” which would allow principals and teachers to spend their money in a very economical manner in order to get the supplies/books that they need for the upcoming school year. Some teachers are very thrifty and these teachers would be the ones that you would want to put on the school budget team.

Technology is underleveraged. Our server is not very powerful but we do use electronic clickers, palm pilots but every school should have  a smart board in each classroom.

Teachers:  The idea by Chancellor Michelle Rhee – DC schools where teachers can be paid using the senority track or the merit based track. The merit based track allows you to be paid your regular salary plus bonuses based upon the achievement of your students. There needs to be more room for advancement and teachers who are interested need to be cross trained to learn a number of jobs in the school.

Student Incentives: Students should be provided with incentives to do well but I would suggest using a combination of student incentives and brain based learning because you want learning to be intrinsic. Currently I use, candy, chips, trips, free computer time as incentives for the students. In the past I gave out savings bonds and cd/radios. Schools can fundraise or write grants to fund these programs.

Performance Measurement and Assessment: Currently Accelerated Math and Study Island are two programs that teachers can use to assess a student’s academic growth in a particular subject. These two programs are excellent for preparing students for standardized tests and ensuring that their foundation skills in math and reading are solid.

COMER  School Development Program: I will talk about this program in depth in another post. This is a wonderful school reform program that involves the teachers, administrators, students and community. Dr. James Comer -Yale University helps educators to learn how to teach the “WHOLE CHILD”.

Real World Application:  I use an episode from “The Wire” , an urban drama produced by HBO to show how children can learn anything if you can break the subject down into real world situations that they can relate to. From Calculus to Shakespeare, children in the urban areas can learn and critically analyze these concepts if they can relate to the content.

The ultimate goal is to narrow the achievement gap between students from a lower socioeconomic status and other students globally and not just students in the United States. Because in the future they will be competing globally for jobs and business and not just within the United States.

July 30, 2008

Why Urban Education?

Welcome to Urban Education – The Here and Now!

What can I say? What can I say? What can I say?

I LOVE talking, writing about urban education. This blog will give me another outlet to express myself about this subject. You can expect to read my opinions about various school leaders, educators, programs, curriculums, schools that deal with urban education.

Why Urban Education?

Because urban education deals with the students in the heart of the urban cities across the country and maybe the world. Their experiences are similar regardless of if they grew up in Georgia, Michigan, New York, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Illinois and the list goes on and on.

One thing that I have discovered while researching about Urban Education is that the problems are the same regardless of what Urban City you live in. Each city has pockets of success in which a couple of schools are doing a “good” job of educating our children for the future.  But as a whole we are losing our children, and I want to talk about it, scream about it and then find solutions to solve the problem.

Let’s talk, debate, agree and disagree about various urban education initiatives HERE and NOW!

 

Follow me on my journey as I look for solutions in regards to educating our children who do not have a voice!

Blog at WordPress.com.